Stockopedia Suggestions

What new features or improvements should we add to Stockopedia? Let us know your feedback below (please note: to report a bug / data issue, please create a ticket using the “Contact Support” link on the right instead).

I suggest you ...

(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. Add ranking system for funds

    Develop a system designed to identify funds which have a higher probability chance of beating the market.

    6 votes
    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • sso
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      I agree to the terms of service
      Signed in as (Sign out)

      We’ll send you updates on this idea

      0 comments  ·  Funds & ETFs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    • Mutual Funds

      Mutual Funds also or this service is no good for me. Other platforms give full global coverage of ALL Instruments for about the same price. SharePad is an example. £50 per month. Its not as pretty as Stockopedia but good. I am on a free trial. Shame! Cya!

      1 vote
      Sign in
      Check!
      (thinking…)
      Reset
      or sign in with
      • sso
      • facebook
      • google
        Password icon
        I agree to the terms of service
        Signed in as (Sign out)

        We’ll send you updates on this idea

        0 comments  ·  Funds & ETFs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
      • More detailed asset allocation for Investment Trusts

        My investment trusts are all classified as financial companies, true, but it would be useful to break this own into sector classification perhaps using the AIC system or similar to give a truer picture of asset allocation

        1 vote
        Sign in
        Check!
        (thinking…)
        Reset
        or sign in with
        • sso
        • facebook
        • google
          Password icon
          I agree to the terms of service
          Signed in as (Sign out)

          We’ll send you updates on this idea

          0 comments  ·  Funds & ETFs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
        • MAKE SURE THAT CASH IS CORRECT WITH HOLDINGS

          Hi there,

          Little suggestion: You now make it seem that holdings are dirt cheap by using their short term investments as "cash etc." while these should not be seen as cash and cash equivalents in this case. Holdings' core business is investing so these positions should not be seen as cash. It is confusing.

          Thanks
          Dieter

          1 vote
          Sign in
          Check!
          (thinking…)
          Reset
          or sign in with
          • sso
          • facebook
          • google
            Password icon
            I agree to the terms of service
            Signed in as (Sign out)

            We’ll send you updates on this idea

            0 comments  ·  Funds & ETFs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
          • Don't see your idea?

          Feedback and Knowledge Base